Jobless to be offered ‘talking treatment’ to help put Britain back to work

Shortlink:  http://wp.me/p5foE-2tv

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

“We run your life, so you don’t have to” courtesy Gordon’s Good Idea

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/dec/04/jobless-therapy-talking-cbt-unemployment

 

Guardian  |  Allegra Stratton, Political correspondent  |  04 December 2009

Jobless to be offered ‘talking treatment’ to help put Britain back to work

Jobcentres will bypass doctors to refer claimants for cognitive behaviour therapy at up to 300 centres

The government has announced mental health co-ordinators will be based in Jobcentres.

Jobless Britons are to be offered therapy to help them get back into work, under a “talking treatment” programme to be announced by the government over the next few weeks.

On Monday the Department for Work and Pensions will announce that mental health co-ordinators will be based in Jobcentres. The plans, which will make mental health treatment and particularly cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) central to the fight to get Britain back to work after the recession, will eventually see centres providing CBT set up around the country.

In the medium term, Jobcentre Plus will be encouraged to send unemployed people for CBT without the need for a doctor’s referral. Within five years the government wants 250-300 therapy centres set up across the UK.

Sessions of CBT – which encourages people to look for potential solutions rather than the causes of difficulties – are today available to patients referred by their doctor, but the government wants to build on 60 pilot schemes to provide therapy centres in most primary care trusts. Successful pilots have shown that a mix of ages and ethnicity is to be encouraged so centres can offer group therapy with a cross-section of people.

The chancellor, Alistair Darling, has signed off the commitment which will cost £550m a year redirected from what the government hopes will be a fall in unemployment. There is no new money involved.

Under the plans, unemployed people would be eligible for eight therapy sessions immediately. Within five years anyone, including people in work, would be allowed to “refer themselves in” for treatment.

One in four people are likely to experience a mental health problem and the effects on the jobs market are acute. Some 6 million adults in the UK have been diagnosed with depression or anxiety, many of whom are on incapacity benefit.

The move follows years of lobbying by Tony Blair’s “happiness tsar”, economist Lord Layard. Provision of cognitive behaviour therapy on the NHS was his earlier triumph but Layard has continued to lobby for it to be central to the jobs strategy.

Layard and others were concerned that people with mild depression attributable to unemployment or working difficulties and referred for CBT by doctors were rarely asked to consider work-related issues. Likewise Jobcentres did not prescribe therapy for those for whom varying degrees of depression were a barrier to work. The former work and pensions secretary, James Purnell, said: “Mild depression doesn’t have to be a barrier to work.”

About 40% of long-term sickness benefit claimants have depression. Work is being done on whether some people should have CBT before they go on to employment support allowance, which an official described as “an eight-week period which prevents people even going into long-term disability”.

The official said: “We want a service where everyone who needs it can get access to basic talking treatments. The pilots are proving so successful that, whilst there are short-term costs, we expect the programme to save money in the long-term by helping people back into work, cutting the benefit bill and lowering costs in the NHS.”

Ministers are worried that past recessions have led to huge rises in the numbers of long-term unemployed.

What is CBT?

Cognitive behaviour therapy doesn’t attempt deep psychoanalysis but instead works to recommend to a patient practical steps to overcome the depression that has proved debilitating for them.

Created in the 1960s by the American psychiatrist Aaron Beck, it operates on the assumption that since emotions are based on patterns of thinking, if the patterns of thinking can be changed so too can the emotions. To the end of changing those patterns, patients are given targets and homework to isolate what makes them blue, and then they can set about managing that trigger.

The government’s adviser on these issues, Lord Layard, believes that a short course of CBT delivered by a therapist with only basic training is all that is required to cure a substantial proportion of those out of work because of depression or mental health problems.

He recommends double the figure the government is suggesting – 16 course sessions – which he costed at £750 a head, something he pointed out was about the cost to the state of someone remaining on incapacity benefit.

Critics accuse CBT of being the ultimate quick-fix solution for a quick-fix age, driving real problems that had possibly surfaced for a reason, deeper into someone’s psyche with unknown later effects.

———————

See also:

BBC News  |  07 December 2009

Depression targeted in government policy shift

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8396147.stm

“10-year strategy expected to call for better identification of those most at risk and wider access to psychological therapies for patients.”

———————

New Statesman

http://www.newstatesman.com/ideas/2009/11/cbt-treatment-health-face

Textual health  | Alyssa McDonald | 26 November 2009

———————

From October 09

On Sunday, the Observer reported on cutbacks faced by Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (Iapt) programme which is failing to meet government tarkets:

The Observer | 4 October 2009

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/oct/04/mental-health-therapy-cbt-psychiatry

Flagship mental health scheme faces cutbacks

Only 400 therapists have been trained out of the 3,600 needed for the scheme

by Jamie Doward

“A flagship government strategy to train an army of therapists to get the nation off antidepressants and into work could be dramatically scaled back amid claims it is experiencing problems.”

The government claims the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (Iapt) programme will treat 900,000 people and help about half of them to make a full recovery. It also aims to get 25,000 people suffering from anxiety and depression off sick pay and benefits by 2010/11.

But the Observer understands there are now concerns about whether these targets can be met.”

Read full article here

————————-

Related material

Tories would force jobless to work  |  Sunday Times  |  4 October 2009
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6860233.ece

Cameron to slash benefit payouts to 500,000 now deemed ‘unfit to work’  |  Times |  5 October 2009 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6861137.ece 

Iapt documents: http://www.iapt.nhs.uk/publications/

See also: The Elephant in the Room Series Two: More on MUPS

See also: Lords Debate on CBT

Image and video hosting by TinyPic“They run your life, so you don’t have to” courtesy Gordon’s Good Idea

Sunday Times: Health and safety snoops to enter family homes

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

“We run your life, so you don’t have to” courtesy Gordon’s Good Idea

Shortlink for this posting: http://wp.me/p5foE-2oj

It was reported, earlier this year, that some local authorities were planning to instruct tradesmen working in the homes of council and housing association tenants to identify and report potential cases of neglect or child abuse.

* NICE Consultation

http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index.jsp?action=folder&o=46007

http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/PUICHomeDraftGuidanceConsultation.pdf

or open here: PUIC Home Draft Guidance Consultation

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE PUBLIC HEALTH DRAFT GUIDANCE
Issue date: April 2010

Preventing unintentional injuries in the home among children and young people aged under 15: providing safety equipment and home-risk assessments

From today’s Sunday Times:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article6917328.ece

Health and safety snoops to enter family homes

Robert Watts  |  15 November 2009

Health and safety inspectors are to be given unprecedented access to family homes to ensure that parents are protecting their children from household accidents.

New guidance drawn up at the request of the Department of Health urges councils and other public sector bodies to “collect data” on properties where children are thought to be at “greatest risk of unintentional injury”.

Council staff will then be tasked with overseeing the installation of safety devices in homes, including smoke alarms, stair gates, hot water temperature restrictors, oven guards and window and door locks.

The draft guidance by a committee at the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (Nice)* has been criticised as intrusive and further evidence of the “creeping nanny state”.

Until now, councils have made only a limited number of home inspections to check on building work and in extreme cases where the state of a house is thought to pose a serious risk to public health.

Nice also recommends the creation of a new government database to allow GPs, midwives and other officials who visit homes to log health and safety concerns they spot.

The guidance aims to “encourage all practitioners who visit families and carers with children and young people aged under 15 to provide home safety advice and, where necessary, conduct a home risk assessment”. It continues: “If possible, they should supply and install home safety equipment.”

The proposals have been put out to consultation and, if approved, will be implemented next year.

Matthew Elliott, of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “It is a huge intervention into family life which will be counter-productive.

“Good parents will feel the intrusion of the state in their homes and bad parents will now have someone else to blame if they don’t bring up their children in a sensible, safe environment.”

About 100,000 children are admitted to hospital each year for home injuries at a cost of £146m.

—————-

See also Daily Mail  |  10 November 2009

Police report pregnant woman to social services over half-decorated home

—————-

See also, in today’s Sunday Times:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article6917160.ece

Think tank: freeing us from the ring of suspicion

Jenni Russsell  |  15 November 2009

“…In his Scott Trust speech, Cameron picked up on the themes that this newspaper has been highlighting: the hidden damage being caused by the government’s vetting and barring regimes. He was unequivocal about the malign effect that the new Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA), with its plans to monitor at least a quarter of the adult population, would have on our lives.”

“Many responsible adults would, the Tory leader said, rather abandon volunteering than go through the rigmarole of a vetting procedure. That mass withdrawal would actually reduce the amount of care and love in children’s lives. This is already happening, although no one in government appears willing to recognise it. Ministers are so busy mouthing platitudes, both in public and in private, about “safeguarding children being our most important priority”, that they don’t want to hear or think about what it means for children when grown-ups decide it’s too risky to spend time with them. Ask them about sports or drama groups closing down for fear of breaking regulations, or of teachers deciding it’s too hazardous to organise school trips, and they say blandly that protection must come first.”

“…They don’t want to know about all the quiet and disastrous ways in which society is being reshaped by the constant message that adults can’t be trusted. Evidence has poured into this paper since the issue was raised here two weeks ago. Some came from professionals who cannot afford any misinterpretation of their interaction with children because of what it means for their jobs.”

Read full article here

Image and video hosting by TinyPic“They run your life, so you don’t have to” courtesy Gordon’s Good Idea

Charities concerned over changes to Mental Health Act in event of Swine Flu pandemic

The charities, Rethink and Mind, have issued concerns over proposed changes to the Mental Health Act in the event of a Swine Flu pandemic. Download Consultation document and link to opinion from FT.com.  Consultation ends 7 October!

Pandemic Influenza and the Mental Health Act 1983 Consultation document

PDF icon l

 

Open:  DH Consultation: Pandemic Influenza and the Mental Health Act

http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Liveconsultations/DH_103683

Pandemic influenza and the Mental Health Act 1983: consultation on proposed changes to the Mental Health Act 1983 and its associated secondary legislation

Launch date: 10 September 2009
Closing date: 7 October 2009
Creator/s: Department of Health
Copyright holder: Crown
Gateway number: 12268

You are invited to comment on proposals for temporary amendments to the Mental Health Act 1983 which may be required in the event of the severe staff shortages that may be expected during an influenza pandemic.

You are invited to say whether you think these proposals are likely to be helpful. Please let us know if there are any significant issues which you think we should have included, or if we have included anything unnecessary.

Download consultation document (PDF, 193K)
http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_103756.pdf

Responding to the consultation
Comments on the content of the consultation document should be sent by Wednesday 7 October 2009 to

Contact: Mental Health Legislation Team
Address: Department of Health
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London SE1 8UG

Email:
pandemicandmentalhealth@dh.gsi.gov.uk

Opinion from FT.com

Swine flu sparks mental health law change  By Andrew Jack and Clive Cookson

Published: September 10 2009 19:33

…The plans could have wide-ranging implications for thousands of patients with suspected psychosis, depression and psychiatric problems who are “sectioned” against their will under the 1983 mental health act…

“To take away just about all the safeguards seems a serious step which removes the protections for patients and professionals. This is a much softer standard than we have now” Dr Tony Zigmond, Royal College of Psychiatrists

Read full article on FT.com here
——————–

Swine flu: Charities concerned over Mental Health Act plans

Community Care   “For everyone in social care”

In an editorial, on 11 September 2009, Jeremy Dunning reported:

Rethink and Mind issue warning over plans to alter sectioning safeguards in light of pandemic

Mental health charities have outlined concerns on proposed temporary changes to the detention of patients under the Mental Health Act in the event of a pandemic flu outbreak.

Rethink and Mind warned that patient safeguards could be compromised after the Department of Health yesterday issued consultative proposals to ensure Mental Health Act functions could be maintained should a flu outbreak trigger severe staff shortages.

The consultation, which is unusually short, closes on 7 October and would lead to the introduction of emergency legislation in the early autumn.

Proposed changes

The proposed amendments fall into three areas:-

  • Reducing from two to one the number of doctors required to comply with a number of actions under the act, including detention for assessment or treatment if the approved mental health professional making the application believes there would otherwise be an undesirable delay.
  • Extending or suspending time limits that apply to certain provisions – for instance suspending the requirement for a second opinion appointed doctor (SOAD) to approve giving a patient medication without consent if they have been in hospital for three months or more.
  • Allowing certain additional people to be approved to undertake some specific functions – for example some recently retired approved social workers may be temporarily approved to undertake the role of the approved mental health professional…

Read full editorial here

A brief article on Wednesday 23 September 2009, in Management in Practice reports:

Swine flu prompts changes to Mental Health Act

The government plans to rush through measures allowing people with suspected mental health issues to be quickly detained because of fears over staff shortages in any forthcoming swine flu outbreak, it has been revealed.

The temporary changes to the Mental Health Act, as laid out in an unusually short consultation lasting just one month, would mean it would only take one doctor, rather than two, to have a person sectioned and put on medication without their consent.

The measures could have a serious effect on the thousands of patients with psychiatric issues who currently live outside state care, meaning many could be detained against their will on the word of just one health professional.

With very little information on the proposed changes published, many mental health experts have warned the government that they risk side-lining an already vulnerable community and have called on it to spell-out the full raft of changes proposed in the consultation.  Source: Management in Practice

More midwinter madness from our government

More midwinter madness from our government

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article5375668.ece

Sunday Times

21 December 2008

Bailiffs get power to use force on debtors

Jon Ungoed-Thomas

“The government has been accused of trampling on individual liberties by proposing wide-ranging new powers for bailiffs to break into homes and to use “reasonable force” against householders who try to protect their valuables.

Under the regulations, bailiffs for private firms would for the first time be given permission to restrain or pin down householders.”

Read full article here

Posted in Civil liberties. Comments Off
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: